【读评论学英语】印度历史电影档案中的新记忆2018-10-19 06:53 5
Trans-Asia Photography Review 在2013年以“Archives”为专题的秋季刊中发表了Madhuja Mukherjee的文章Walking through Ephemeral Archives and Creating Settings for New Memories。
Madhuja Mukherjee teaches Film Studies at Jadavpur University, Kolkata,India. She has published two books on early Indian cinema and film sound. Mukherjee is a filmmaker and installation artist; her first graphic-novel (in Bengali) was published in August 2013.
Trans-Asia Photography Review is published by Hampshire College in collaboration with Michigan Publishing, with support from the Five College Consortium.
Editor’s note: Madhuja Mukherjee has been working with publicity images from the Indian film industry since 2004. Her “working notes” on the project have been published in the journal South Asian Popular Culture (October 2011), and her art installations have been presented in Santiniketan, India; at Studio 21, in Kolkata, India; and in Rotterdam, the Netherlands (at the 41st International Film Festival), 2011-2012. The selection of images below gives a sense of her long-term, multifaceted project and her first installation piece.
Fig. 1. Unidentified and damaged publicity material.
Any storyteller embarking on archival research will tell you that the tactile quality of the material is as alluring and elusive as is the method itself. This becomes particularly meaningful when one is handling hundreds of small (roughly 4 inches x 2.5 inches) glass-plate negatives found somewhere (and somehow) in Kolkata, India.
Fig. 2. Unidentified negative image.
Fig. 3. Rejected publicity image, with the figure upside down.
My research on this material began in 2004 with a “what lies beneath” kind of quest. The procedure involved meticulous scanning of the negatives and unclear images and, afterward, turning the digital images into positives.
Figs. 4a and 4b. Different stages of poster art for the Bengali film Jiban Maran (1939).
Fig. 5. Lobby card.
Fig. 6. Lobby card.
What, at the onset, appeared to be black-and-white blotches reemerged as lobby cards and posters referencing both popular and unreleased Indian films of the 1940s to the 1960s. These materials were not big posters for exhibition on the streets; rather, they were pictures and teasers to be publicized within the theaters. They needed to be examined as objects that call to mind memories of certain spaces and places. Thus, the reclamation of this material was like excavating an archaeological site and traversing through the tracks of cinematic histories, collective memory, and chronicles of urban cultures.
Fig. 7. Nargis, of Mother India (1957) fame, in one of her early productions.
Fig. 8. The singer-actor Suraiya, who fell from stardom after the rise of Nargis.
Figs. 9a and 9b. Images taken from the series of lobby cards.
Figs. 10a and 10b. Images taken from the series of lobby cards.
Fig. 11. A high-contrast publicity image of Shakti, an unreleased film.
Fig. 12. Usha-Kiran (1952), the Indian Mata Hari.
Fig. 13. Poster for a Bengali film.
Fig. 14. Lobby card for a Hindi film.
In addition, during the second phase of the research (2008–10), a large number of advertisements (intended for projection in theaters) for consumer items and public events were recovered.
Figs. 15a and 15b. Advertisements for “Raymond Circus” and the film Circuswale (1959).
Figs. 16a and 16b. Poster for the film Noor Mahal (1954) and an advertisement for a mirror by the T. C. Dass company.
The film publicity images together with these advertisements—for beer, honey, local cigars, soaps, shoes, health drinks, medicines, sarees, lightbulbs, cables, ambassador cars, airlines, wrestling matches, circus shows, and so on— demonstrated that films were part of a wider consumer culture and inspired me to take up an interdisciplinary framework. I wanted to explore the ways in which technological and industrial conditions, popular melodramas, advertisements, and art practices merged their respective courses in the cinemas’ lobbies.
Importantly, almost one-fourth of the material could not be identified; thus, it remained outside film archives and, consequently, our histories. Producing the following media installation with a range of unidentified images, I attempted to create an interface that was playful, provocative, and an abstraction of the ways in which films are remembered beyond the texts.
Fig. 17. UFO: Unidentified Filmic Objects.
Fig. 18. The artist Syed Taufik Riaz performs with the artworks during my show “Interiority,” at Studio 21, Kolkata, April 2011.
“Theatres of Spectacle,” along with the video “Flaneuse,” was held at Nandan Art Gallery, Kala Bhavan, Visva-Bharati University, Santiniketan, India, during February 2011. This audiovisual installation was about women inside cinemas and the ways in which women encounter spectacular images of the female stars.
Cinematic spaces, on the one hand, are dominated by big close-ups of attractive stars; on the other, women in India from different walks of life have somewhat limited access to such spaces. In this installation, the milieu of the theaters — the winding stairways, the big mirrors, the echo of voices, the half-public/half-private dark hall, the washroom — was re-crafted by projecting moving images as well as sounds, and by strategically putting up artworks, found objects, and mirrors.
Fig. 19. The installation site, Nandan Art Gallery.
As viewers entered the mediated space, they came across luminous images of “the shining stars” (in LED-lit boxes) hanging against dark walls, placed at disparate horizontal and vertical planes.
Fig. 20. Long shot of Theatres of Spectacle installation,2011.
On the left, the video work entitled “Flaneuse” (approx. 28 mins.) made observations about issues of genre, gender, desire, movement, and modes of film viewing by using clips from a long list of movies, and by overlaying poems and theoretical comments on them.
Fig. 21. Close-up of the artworks.
Fig. 22. Abstractions and distortions.
On the right (figure 22), huge reflective acrylic sheets hanging opposite the boxes and the video screen presented distorted reflections of the onlookers along with the entire studio space (its walls, floor, and ceiling), thereby disturbing the veil of perspective. The floor was covered with a huge collage (vinyl print) created from images of sets and photographs of cinema halls taken during the research. Notes and red arrows drawn on the floor commented on the collective memory of viewing and the function of cinema as a cultural form. In addition, filmstrips hung mysteriously in the center space and the solitary door of a ladies bathroom (shut from inside; located at the far left) highlighted “the women’s question.”